Australia calls the Great Barrier Reef a politically motivated warning

Australia has labeled the UN World Heritage Committee’s draft decision to include the Great Barrier Reef on its list as a political motive.

The committee, chaired by Chinese Deputy Minister of Education Tian Huejun’s selection of UNESCO World Heritage Sites, has proposed adding the world’s largest collection of coral reefs to the endangered list. Harmful effect Climate change զարգացման Coastal development.

The designation could eventually cause the sail to lose some of its World Heritage status, although officials said the list was intended to take urgent action to preserve the living structure, which stretches 2,300km off the east coast of Australia.

But Australian Environment Minister Susan Leigh said the government was “blinded” by the commission’s conclusion, insisting there was a lack of consultation and transparency. He added that Canberra will challenge the draft decision.

“When the procedures are not followed, when the process is turned upside down five minutes before the draft decision is published, when the assurances received by my officials, և I really have stopped, what else can you conclude, but it is a policy?” he said.

The chairmanship of the World Heritage Committee has raised suspicions in Canberra by high-ranking Chinese officials that it has been separated from its diplomatic mission. Trade clash with Beijing,

Sino-Australian relations have soured since Canberra last year called for an investigation into the origin of Covid-19 to impose tariffs on Beijing imports of Australian wine and barley.

Lei said he and Australian Foreign Minister Maris Payne had already spoken with UNESCO Director-General Audrey Azoula to appeal the draft decision.

But scientists have underestimated the “endangered” hypothesis listing: He had political motives. They say three massive bleaching events in five years have shown that the government needs to do more to tackle climate change.

“I see that there is some coverage in the press, saying that this is a plot by China to buy wine, to buy lobster, to unscrew the barrier. “I think it’s very far-fetched given that the overnight draft decision will be voted on by 21 countries,” said Terry Hughes, a professor of marine biology at Cook University.

The dispute will add more international pressure on Canberra, which has put pressure on the United States, Britain and other countries to stay true to the national zero-emission target by 2050.

In a draft decision on voting next month, the committee urged Canberra to “make clear commitments to tackling climate change threats under the 2015 Paris Agreement.” Goals և Allow to achieve faster water quality goals. ”

It notes that after the bleaching event in 2016, there was a loss of almost a third of the shallow water coral cover. A process associated with more normal water that can lead to mass. coral dying,

The controversy over the “Endangered” list came at a difficult time for the Conservative Coalition in Australia, which is embroiled in internal disputes over climate policy.

On Monday, Barnaby oy ous, a skeptical coal’s advocate for coal mining, ousted Michael McCormack, becoming leader of the National Party, a junior coalition partner of the Liberal Party, and Deputy Prime Minister of Australia. It is expected that oyce will oppose any move to commit to zero by 2050.

Climate capital

Where climate change is relevant to business, markets and policies. Examine FT coverage here,

Are you interested in FT’s environmental sustainability commitments? Learn about our science-based targets here

Source link

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button