World

US Supreme Court upholds child slave labor lawsuit against Nestle և Cargill | Child rights news


The judges ruled 8-1 in favor of food businesses մի Six adult Mali citizens vs. Mali who claimed to have taken children from their children և forced them to work on cocoa farms near Ivory Coast.

The United States Supreme Court on Thursday sued food giant Nestle և Cargill in a lawsuit alleging they deliberately bought cocoa beans from African farms that used child labor.

The judges ruled 8-1 in favor of food businesses մի Six adult Mali citizens vs. Mali who claimed to have taken children from their children և forced them to work on cocoa farms near Ivory Coast.

The judges said the appellate court had erred in advancing the group’s lawsuit.

“Although the defendants’ injuries occurred entirely abroad, District 9 confirmed that the respondents could sue in federal court because the defendant corporations allegedly ‘made major operating decisions’ in the United States. “The ninth district erred in allowing this lawsuit to continue,” Clarence Thomas wrote in a majority for the court.

The case was dismissed twice before it could be reopened by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. When the case was challenged in December, then-President Donald Trump’s administration backed Nestle and Cargill.

The argument from the group from Mali is that Cargill, based in Minneapolis, Nest the American Nestle, based in Switzerland, “supported and supported” slavery as a child, by buying cocoa beans from farms using child labor. The group sued seeking class litigation on behalf of those they thought were thousands of other slave children.

Nestle and Cargill have stated that they have taken steps to combat child slavery and have denied any wrongdoing.

The case concerns a law passed by the First Congress in 1789, the Alien Torture Act, which allows foreign nationals to sue for human rights abuses. The question of justice was whether it allows lawsuits against American companies.

In recent years, the Supreme Court has restricted the use of the Alien Torture Act. In 2018, the court ruled that the law could not be filed against foreign business. In that case, the court rejected an Israeli attempt by the Israeli victims of the attacks in the West Bank, Gaza Strip, to use US courts to sue an Arab bank in Jordan, which they believe helped finance the attacks.

Case in point: Nestle USA v. Doe I, 19-416, և Cargill Inc. v. Doe I, 19-453:





Source link

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button