Is Money Succeeding? For those who do not believe in it, think again.
The owners of the most expensive teams built in the world of football are going to find out that Chelsea will play against “Manchester City” in the UEFA Champions League final this Saturday.
Winning the greatest honor in European club football will be the final payoff for the billionaire sponsors who have invested hundreds of millions in building their football business.
Roman Abramovich, the Russian-Israeli tycoon who bought Chelsea in 2003, hopes to repeat 2012, the club’s first and only victory in the competition.
At the same time, the City under the control of the billionaire Deputy Prime Minister of the United Arab Emirates Sheikh Mansour bin Ayyed Al-Nahyan, “City” is hoping for the first silver medal of the club, after winning the third title in the Premier League four years later. Both owners have spent about մլրդ 1.6 billion on a network of players since taking the helm.
Only the third final of the Champions League between the two English clubs is celebrated on Saturday.
Before the first two English finals in 2008-2019, more than a decade apart, it took the last two years for these two Premier League teams to reach the final of the Europa League.
Deloitte’s Football Money League FT analysis shows that English clubs in the top 15 teams in Europe have averaged more revenue than their mainland rivals in nine of the last 16 seasons. And the dominance of the Premier League is growing. English clubs have surpassed their European rivals in six of the previous seven seasons, boosting the league’s global appeal by billions of pounds in broadcasting revenue.
“English clubs, especially those with charitable owners who want to invest on the pitch, have a potential advantage over other European clubs,” said Kieran Maguire, a professor of football finance and accounting at the University of Liverpool. “The Premier League broadcast deal gives him a huge advantage over the rest of UEFA, which is competing for the European Cup.”
Before the epidemic destroyed 8.1 billion euros For the last two seasons, for the income of top European clubs, which limits many in the transfer market, City «Chelsea have not been contacted.
According to Transfermarkt.com, Chelsea have spent more than միլիոն 220 million this season to strengthen their squad, about the same as Barcelona և Juventus, who are third and fourth in the transfer table.
Manchester City have invested միլիոն 150 million in new players, including € 68 million for defender Robben Diaz from Benfica and € 23 million for midfielder Ferran Torres, who has scored four goals in six Champions League games.
Chelsea were the only club to spend more than միլիոն 100 million on players sold, while City avoided 97 97 million. In contrast, Borussia M Մnchengladbach, who also played in this season’s Champions League, have spent just միլիոն 12m on new contracts, leaving players with income 13 times less than the English club in the north.
But expensive contracts are not the only reason for performances on the field. Investing in academia has helped ensure that Chelsea and City have younger players compared to the value of the squad than many of their rivals. Academy graduate Phil Foden, 20, has played in all 12 games so far, scoring three goals, according to him, worth 72 million pounds, according to Transfermarkt. Before Chelsea Mason Mount, just two years older, he scored twice in 10 games, worth 67.5 million pounds.
Collectively, these highly valued young players have influenced the club’s activities, keeping the squads young. At the age of 27, City և Chelsea զգալի Chelsea are significantly younger than Real Madrid, PSG և Italian Յ Juventus:. However, with income from the top 10 European clubs, Barcelona had the lowest average age of 24 for its first team.
The finalists of the Champions League are also the high value of the team, whose average market value is about 30 million pounds. In contrast, PSG, where the highly regarded 4 144 million Կ Killian Mbabane plays, has an average player value of half that of the English club competing in this year’s competition.
On paper, City is a strong team. Uefa ranks Manchester third and Chelsea 12th in Europe. At home, City brought back the Premier League title from Liverpool and retained the League Cup trophy. Chelsea lost in the FA Cup final, another domestic cup, finishing fourth in the league.
But Chelsea’s results have been growing since the London club hired former PSG boss Thomas Tuchel, who lost in the 2020 final against Bayern Munich in January to replace Frank Lampard, when the club were relegated to ninth place. The sad task is to stop City supercomputer Pep Guardiola from becoming only the fourth champion to win the Champions League three times.
Recent evidence suggests that Chelsea are capable of worrying, having beaten City twice in domestic competition in the last two months.
“We know that anything can happen in the final. Luck is a huge part, a mental approach to it. “Who can handle the pressure of small details?” This week Tuchel said“Man City is a benchmark, ‘they are champions, we are the guys who want to catch them, we want to close the gap.’
Additional report by Chris Campbell